| Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of any component of this site, in whole or in part, is a violation of applicable federal copyright laws and international copyright treaties. | ||||
|
|
||||
|
OUR AMERICAN COUSIN Laura Keene's production of this play is a landmark
in American Theatre history on a number of grounds. It's known, if at
all, outside theatrical circles because it was being performed when Abraham
Lincoln was assassinated on that fateful Good Friday at Ford's Theatre.
But it is noteworthy as well for being perhaps the first truly "long
run" in American Theatre, forcing new procedures for ticketing and
a new way of employing and using actors. The long run pronounced the death
knell of the stock company as it had was known at the time. It also establishing
the stardom of two of America's most successful starring personalities,
E.A.Sothern and Joseph
Jefferson III. This excerpt from Joseph Jefferson's famous Autobiography tells of the advent of Our American Cousin:
The reading took place in the greenroom, at which the
ladies and gentlemen of the company were assembled, and many furtive glances
were cast at Mr. Couldock and me as the strength
of Abel Murcott and Asa Trenchard were revealed. As the treasury began to fill, Miss Keene began to twinkle
with little brilliants ; gradually her splendor increased, until at the
end of three months she was ablaze with diamonds. Whether these were new
additions to her impoverished stock of jewelry, or the return of old friends
that had been parted with in adversity,-old friends generally leave us
under these circumstances,- I cannot say, but possibly the latter. The greatest love scene that ever was or ever will be
written is known as the balcony scene in "Romeo and Juliet."
This is a perfect model, being full of the most exquisite humor. Natural
love off the stage is almost invariably humorous, even comic- not to the
lovers' minds; oh, no! 'T is serious business to them, and that is just
what makes it so delightful to look at. The third party, when there is
one, enjoys it highly. The principals do the most foolish things: the
gentleman cannot make up his mind what to do with his hat or with his
hands, the lady is awkward and shy, and the more they love each other
the more comical they are. They say stupid things, and agree with each
other before they have half done expressing an opinion. The Abel Murcott of Mr. Couldock was a gem, and the extravagant
force and humor of Mr. Sothern's Dundreary, the fame of which afterwards
resounded all over the English-speaking world, is too well known to need
any comment, except perhaps to mention one or two matters connected with
it of a curious nature. Miss Keene was undoubtedly delighted at Sothern's rising fame. I think she found that I was becoming too strong to manage, and naturally felt that his success in rivaling mine would answer as a curb, and so enable her to drive me with more ease and a tighter rein. I don't blame her for this: as an actor has a right to protect himself against the tyranny of a manager, the manager has an equal right to guard the discipline of the theater, and I have no doubt that I perhaps unconsciously exhibited a confidence in my growing strength that made her a little apprehensive lest I should try to manage her. In this she did me an injustice, which I am happy to say in after years the lady acknowledged. The first rupture between us came about somewhat in this way. The Duchess - as she was familiarly called by the actors, on the sly - had arranged some new business with Mr. Sothern, neglecting to inform me of it. I got the regular cue for entering, and as I came upon the stage I naturally, but unintentionally, interrupted their preconceived arrangements. This threw matters into a confusion which was quite apparent to the audience. Miss Keene, not stopping to consider that I had been kept in ignorance of her plan and that the fault was hers and not mine, turned suddenly on me, and speaking out so loudly and plainly that most of the audience could hear her, said, " Go off the stage, sir, till you get your cue for entering." I was thunderstruck. There was a dead silence for a moment, and in the same tone and with the same manner she had spoken to me, I replied: " It has been given, and I will not retire." We were both wrong. No actor has a right to show up to the audience an accident or a fault committed on the stage, or intrude upon them one's personal misunderstandings. As two wrongs cannot make a right, it was clearly my duty to pass this by, so far as any public display of my temper was concerned, and then demand an explanation and an apology from her when the play was over. But who can be wise, amazed, temperate and furious, loyal and neutral, in a moment? Besides, I felt that no explanation of hers could set me right with the audience, and I was smarting under the injustice of her making me appear responsible for her own fault. When the curtain fell she was furious, and turning on me with flashing eyes and an imperious air discharged me then and there. I might leave now if I liked, and she would dismiss the audience rather than submit to such a public insult. I told her that if she considered my conduct an insult to her, that it was a confession that she had insulted me first, as my words and manner were but a reflection of her own. This sort of logic only made matters worse. So I informed her that I could not given in the heat of temper, and take a discharge would remain. The play proceeded, but she was singularly adroit, and by her manner in turning her back on me through an entire scene, and assuming an air of injured innocence, undoubtedly made the audience believe that I was a cruel wretch to insult her in so public a way. She had the advantage of me all through, for when her temper was shown to me the play was proceeding, and I dare say that in the bustle and confusion of the scene very few of the audience could understand what she had done; whereas when I retaliated there had been a pause, and they got the full force of what I said. When an actor shows his temper upon the stage the audience
feel insulted that they should be called upon to sympathize with his private
quarrels. The actor is the loser, depend upon it. Mr. Rufus Blake was
attached to our company during this season, but in consequence of the
great success of " Our American Cousin," in which he was not
cast, he had acted but little. He was a superior actor, with the disadvantage
of small eyes, a fat, inexpressive face, and a heavy and unwieldy figure.
There must be something in the spirit of an actor that is extremely powerful
to delight an audience when he is hampered like this. Without seeming
to change his face or alter the stolid look from his eyes, Mr. Blake conveyed
his meaning with the most perfect effect. He was delicate and minute in
his manner, which contrasted oddly enough with his ponderous form. We
acted this one season together and were very good friends. He rated me for curtailing some of the speeches of a part
in one of the old comedies. I told him that I had my own ideas on these
matters, one of which was that the plays were written for a past age,
that society had changed, and that it seemed to me good taste to alter
the text, when it could be done without detriment, to suit the audience
of the present day. particularly when the lines were coarse, and unfit
for ladies and gentlemen to speak or listen to. He gave me to understand
that he considered it a liberty in any young man to set him self up as
an authority in such matters, and that my course was a tacit reproach
to older and better judges, and even hinted that some people did that
sort of thing to make professional capital out of it. I do not cite this quarrel as redounding to my credit. Mr. Blake was a much older man than I, and more than my peer as an actor besides. It was not only my words; I was angered, and doubtless my manner was more offensive than what I had said. I apologized, however, and we were friends. As Laura Keene's season drew to a close she and I had
buried our differences and were comparatively good friends again; so the
lady was somewhat surprised to learn that I was not going to remain with
her during the following season, and seemed to consider it unkind of me
to withdraw from the theater after she had done so much to advance my
position. This is the somewhat unjust ground that managers often take
when an actor desires to go to another house. This is unreasonable, for
there must come a time when it will be for the interest of one or both
parties that they should part; and it would be just as wrong at one time
as at another. If an actor, when the season is concluded and his obligations
are at an end, sees an opportunity of increasing his salary or bettering
his position by going to another establishment, it would be an injustice
to himself and to those who depend upon him not to do so. And by the same
reasoning, if a manager can secure better talent, at a more reasonable
price, he has a perfect right to replace one actor by another, having
fulfilled his engagement. I have never known any manager to hesitate in
pursuing this course, unless he retained the actor as an act of charity,
and then, of course, the matter is a purely personal one.
Come Back Soon |
||||